Opened a Box

This is heart wenching.

Looked for a book tonight “The Selfish Gene” by Richard Dawkins.

Reason being Cernovich has a video about memes which refers to a chapter of the book. Ironically it is Chapter 11.

And man I just knew I didn’t sell that book.

I guess I looked harder this time then the other times.

So I opened a box and found everything but one I had been searching for since entering the Appendix N pulp revolution discussion.

Check it:

found

Yeah none are pulp or appendix N I know. But at least in my mind, all had a part to play in the discussion I wanted to put out.

Sure it may have been crap. Yet it would have been something and at least even if only marginally better then the “I don’t like Rawles character arcs and therefor it ain’t superversive” or “Is Steven King’s ‘The IT’ pulp?” discussions. Seriously WTF?!

Ask if Action Comics #1 or if Hodgson are Pulp. Now that would be interesting.

Anyway more or less I have written, been written and not-written myself out of pulp revolution.

So discovering these way after past discussions in which they might have relevant is like ash in my mouth. Can hardly remember honestly. What was that point about the Left Hand of Darkness I had in regards to Pulp Revolution? No idea. Can’t go back. That PK Dick book probably had nothing of value I was looking for. I can’t even remember reading it!

Funny enough I have an index card book mark in it on which I wrote:

“Know that all gods, with lordship of all that transpires in the world, are gods of death”

Is that a quote? Did I write that? No idea. Further no idea what i was thinking about in either case. Back of the card I had written Lord of the Rings quotes. Like “a corpse-light, a light that illuminated nothing”, “The sword broke sparkling into many shards” and “fled wailing back to hide in holes and dark lightness places far from hope”

Maybe it is a Tolkien quote. Or I wrote it thinking about Tolkien’s reprieve that his book is about death. Hey people do read this blog and I suspect many if not most are middle earth nerds. What the heck was Tolkien talking about that his book is about death?

The big book at the bottom has friggen everything in it. Beowolf, Chaucer, Shakespeare you name it. I wanted it for Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels. There was some discussion of about the origins of SFF awhile back. Side note here. Swear to god the lady who played the oracle in the matrix looked the spitting image of the professor of the class I got that book for.

That Bayley book “Knights of the Limits” would be classified as New Wave I think. I just remembered how weird those stories were….but don’t actually remember any of the stories!!! I think one is about bees. LULZ.

This was before Appendix N became Pulp revolution. I guess I wanted a reread and see if it was N stuff. N stuff has a Pulp quality. Namely the stories are not finalities like epics or Campbellian stuff are and in their wake after the story is told leave behind whole universes to explore. You know. Places were you set an RPG in.

Hemingway cuz SJWs. Poe and “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” for obvious reasons. Dostoevsky cuz Underground Man which leads to both anti-heroes and pink slime. “I am a sick man…I am a spiteful man. I am an unattractive man. I believe my liver is diseased.” romanticized every crap SF short story writer of the past 20 years about himself.

Harlen is just there. Tempting me to rip and burn.

That is it…

Oh yeah the three Greek tragedies. I don’t know. I guess I wanted to spit in Nietzsche’s eye and his analysis about how erect he gets from tragedy.

Not even kidding by the way:

“In this state one enriches everything out of one’s own fullness: whatever one sees, whatever wills is seen swelled, taut, strong, overloaded with strength. A man in this state transforms things until they mirror his power—until they are reflections of his perfection. This having to transform into perfection is—art.”

There is one book missing. That would be “The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay”

Michael Chabon really does a job on heroes in that one. Hell I want to say he takes it right out of Nietzsche’s boner inducing “tragedy is art” spiel. I wanted to rip and burn that as well. But yeah i am more then positive I did sell that one.

And that That is it.

Black Pigeon Speaks is Wrong.

Not a whole lot but there is one thing.

In his video he repeats the claim made by a psychologist made during a politically charged speech about sex.

According to genetic research, 80% of women reproduce, but only 40% of men reproduce.

In the past…

Cuz girls like harems….

The article as well as the speech as well as BPS claim this comes from recent genetic research.

What research? Neither the speech the article on the speech not BPS tells us.

Well if you are researching sex and rates of reproduction and using genetics the only way to do that is to look at the sex determining X and Y chromosomes.

Anyway I am pretty sure the actual genetic research does not make this 80% 40% claim and makes something more along the lines of: the diversity of the X chromosome is greater then the Y chromosome and over time (generations) the diversity of the X chromosome persists better then the Y chromosome.

Non-geneticists then took that info and manipulated it to assign those sex genes to human beings and their sex and their numbers then derive at what ratio reproduced and what ratio didn’t.

Two problems with that.

The first and lesser problem is that the X chromosome is a bigger chromosome then the Y chromosome. 153 million base pairs vs 58 million base pairs. As such the X chromosome is more susceptible to mutation then the Y chromosome. 153 million chances for mutation over a time period vs only 58 million chances for mutation over that same time period. More mutations equals more diversity. Over time there will be more kinds of X chromosomes then there are kinds of Y chromosomes in a given population.

The second and greater problem is that in any given population made up of 50% women and 50% men there are three times as many X chromosomes then there are Y chromosomes. Women have two X chromosomes while men have one Y and one X. This also amplifies the problem stated in the the first problem if there are more X chromosomes to be mutated there will be more mutated X chromosomes. If X chromosomes have more mutations then the genome of a population’s X chromosomes will be more diverse then the genome of a population’s Y chromosomes.

Anyway because of the way sex is determined in sexual reproduction the Y chromosome with always be under greater pressure to survive then the X chromosome and therefor more likely to be extinguished.

The easiest example would be a father who sires only daughters. Although his genes are reproduced his Y chromosome is domed and extinct. The only way for his Y chromosome to be passed on is to have sons. This distortion is compounded by the fact that in any genetic study that is looking at the success of sex genes to be passed on will count any X chromosome contributed by a man to his off spring as a success for the X chromosome despite it being contributed by a man. All that genetic diversity that he injected into his daughters when they are eggs would be counted as diversity in the X chromosome column despite it being a man who successfully reproduced.

A third problem that I just thought of.

Genes often cross and recombine. This is like a mutation but isn’t. When you have two pairs of chromosomes unwinding and doing bat shit crazy stuff in a newly fertilized cell next to each other they sometimes cross streams as it were and genes of those two chromosomes are traded. But the sex genes have trouble if this happens. The X chromosome and the Y chromosome are different sizes have different genes and they do different stuff. In a female fertilized egg this isn’t an issue. The man’s contributed X chromosome exchange genes with the woman’s contributed X chromosome and 9 months later a healthy baby girl is born. For boys not so much. Genes cannot be exchanged like for like and if it occurs will kill the fertilized egg or screw up the Y chromosome so bad it won’t be expressed (You get a sterile genetic male with a woman’s phenotypical  characteristics) or screw up the Y chromosome so that only the X chromosome is ever viable for sexual reproduction of that baby boy when he reaches adulthood.

Fundamentally the only way to determine if a man reproduced is to check for a Y chromosome. Because of the nature of the chromosomes that determine sex there will always be a bias against the diversity of the Y chromosome. Harem or no harem.

Note: Don’t cry for the Y chromosome too much. Yeah it is the chromosome that makes a person a man. I like it sure but for the most part it is just a switch puller. It tells the rest of a person’s genes to either shut off or turn on. It is the other genes you have which determine what kind of man you will be. The Y tells the fair coloring, fidgety vanity, and ripe boob genes to turn off and also tells the dark beard, sperg aggression and itchy balls genes to turn on. Both sexes have the itchy balls and ripe boob genes. The presence or absence of the Y chromosome determines which ones are turned off or on.

 

Derpy Derp…lulz….wait….wut?

Almuric

Hey look at that; Robert E Howard gave his Black Pirates of Barsoom wings.

“But they spoke of strange unhuman beings or survivals. They told me of the Yagas, a terrible race of winged black men. dwelling far to the south, within sight of the Girdle, in the grim city of Yugga, on the rock Yuthla, by the river Yogh, in the land of Yagg, where living man had never set foot. The Yagas, the Guras said, were not true men, but devils in a human form”

Hmm that looks like a Lovecraft thing. Howard put a Cthulhu heavy in his Barsoom Pastiche! I know I will look up some Lovecraft lingo to drop in an ever so clever gab post.

“The thing that had emerged from the dome was bigger then an elephant, and in shape something like a giantic slug, except that it had a fringe of tentacles all about its body. And from these writhing tentacles crackled sparks and flashes of blue flame.”

Howard’s Yagas are Lovecraft’s Nightgaunts. Lulz.

Nightgaunts have a vaguely human shape, but are thin, black, and faceless. Their skin is slick and rubbery. They sport a pair of inward-facing horns on their heads, a long barbed tail, and prehensile paws which are used to “tickle” their victims into submission. They can fly using a set of membranous wings. They make no sound.”

yaga

wut?

“The Statement of Randolph Carter”

“Randolph Carter”

Carter

What?

“I remember how I shuddered at his facial expression on the night before the awful happening, when he talked so incessantly of his theory, why certain corpses never decay, but rest firm and fat in their tombs for a thousand years.”

carter

WHAT?!?

The story begins by describing how the modern world has been stripped of imagination and belief in magic. The protagonist is an unnamed man who lives in a dull and ugly city. Every night for many years the man gazes from his window upon the stars, until he comes over time to observe secret vistas unsuspected by normal humanity. One night the gulf between his world and the stars is bridged, and his mind ascends from his body out unto the boundless cosmos.”

 

azinoth

WHAT THE F?!?!

“While the influence of the fantasies of Lord Dunsany on Lovecraft’s Dream Cycle is often mentioned, Robert M. Price argues that a more direct model for The Dream-Quest is provided by the six Mars (“Barsoom”) novels of Edgar Rice Burroughs that had been published by 1927.”

barsoom

……

Note: Both “Almuric” and “The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath” were published after their respective authors were dead….

Howard and Lovecraft were Barsoom fan-fic penpals.

The False Consciousness Block

“Royal Marine” Jonathan McCalmont of Interzone fame has blocked me from commenting on his blog Ruthless Culture.

I still have not lost my charm with post new wave fandom.

 

stross
What did I say?

You can see the two comments I got in here. They are fairly tame IMHO.

My third and final comment dealt I think with a characteristic of the dear red Scot that others have not mentioned. So I post it here for posterity.

My comment is in reply to this.

“The single greatest fear of the American Republican party is that the white working class will someday realise that they have more in common with working class black people than with white millionaires. The greatest fear of the puppies is that white dude SF readers will one day realise that female black and minority ethnic writers have a greater understanding of what they’re going through than a tax exile with a trust fund.”

This is Marxist False Consciousness.

You even have the ol’ skool class basis of it mixed in with the new feminism and race variants.

You hit em all fam!

Good job….I guess.

“A lot of what passes for drives towards inclusivity and diversity in genre spaces is really nothing more than the market correcting itself.”

So your whole market analysis here is based on a mini-awakening from the false consciousness of the working classes (strangely only minority and women working classes) that supposedly occurred back in the 80s and 90s will somehow grow large into full on revolt by the entire white working class in their reading habits of SFF……

Holy fuck dude!

Why on earth would an awakening of the proletariat that was supposed to happen back in (((The Great War))) suddenly manifest today in white working class SFF reading habits!?!?!

Note: White Millennials are the most conservative generation the US has seen in modern history and white Gen Z polls even more conservative then them. Why they will SOON be consuming stories about POC trannys discussing the artisinal crafted food condiment singularity with their uplifted cats at the coffee shop rather than reading stories about Cyborg Kull with chaste NEET Jane in nanoweave bronze underwear over his shoulder lasering down hordes of uplifted tranny cats while they escape a Spengler’s Winter Apocalypse on 10,000 AD Venus is a question you left unanswered.

Archive of “royal marine” tweet: http://archive.is/4lHhE

Tarzan in Strange Beds

Warning I’m going to cuss….

A lot.

God damn it, I fucking knew it!

That son of bitch Heinlein took the claim of Edgar Rice Burroughs in Tarzan that love romance fidelity monogamy and marriage are innate virtues and deconstructed it then shat it out in a Cultural Marxist porn filled stream of diarrhea.

Fuck you Heinlein. May your corpse spin you piece of shit.

Oh yeah and you are liar as well:

“Heinlein got the idea for the novel when he and his wife Virginia were brainstorming one evening in 1948. She suggested a new version of Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Book (1894), but with a child raised by Martians instead of wolves.”

Kipling my ass. Your Martian Tarzan was aimed at Burroughs and now I know it for a fact you dead old sterile impotent fuck!

thark

Stranger in a Strange Bed

thark

 

Hesitated for a bit. Then I thought about the impossibility of Heinlein not thinking about “A Princess of Mars” more then a few times when he wrote it.

Plus a few minutes ago I just read this:

“Isaac Asimov believed that Heinlein made a swing to the right politically at the same time he married Ginny.”

But hey the guy did invent the water bed. A device guaranteed to ruin sex, loving or unloving, for anyone. His frustration would be expected even at his age and health.